In yet another stunning example of cold dispassion, Everhart Museum of Natural History & Art officials in Scranton, Pennsylvania, refuse to respond to my questions about whether they possess Native American human remains. And, if they do, why have they failed to adhere to federal law that requires them to return the human remains to the appropriate tribe?
Museum officials have already shown gross disregard for propriety by trying to ignore their shoddy handling of other human remains. Everhart representatives once publicly flaunted the mummified corpse of a 2,000-year-old male teenager they claim is Peruvian. They billed the event as an entertaining way to celebrate college basketball “March Madness.”
Museum officials then compounded that grisly exhibit that dirties the museum’s reputation as a respectful repository of the past. They refuse to explain what happened to one and maybe two shrunken heads museum administrators displayed as human and featured for years to the ghoulish delight of children and other insensitive gawkers.
Museum officials even posted a bizarre slide show on Facebook that showed what appeared to be a tiny human head, shrunken and tanned by boiling, its mouth agape as long wavy dark hair swings in a grim display the museum previously presented to the public. Nine years after posting the photos and within days of my describing the body part in a column, somebody deleted the Everhart Facebook posting.
Now, following the shocking 2023 report in the Pulitzer Prize winning digital non-profit news outlet ProPublica titled “The Repatriation Project” that details “The Delayed Return of Native Remains,” the January 2025 updated ProPublica database says, “The Everhart Museum reported still having the remains of one Native American that it has not made available for return to tribes.”
“America’s institutions hold human remains and sacred items taken from the graves of tens of thousands of Native Americans,” says the ProPublica series introduction. “A federal law, the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), was meant to help return them, but decades after its 1990 passage, many tribes are still waiting.”
Under the auspices of the U.S. Department of the Interior, the National Park Service (NPS) enforces NAGPRA violations. In an email NPS Public Affairs spokeswoman Sarah Sparhawk said, “The museum (Everhart) reported these human remains to the NPS in 1995, as required by the Act. More information on a specific inventory would reside with the appropriate museum.”
In a June 4 email I asked Everhart CEO and Executive Director Timothy Lennon Holmes, Everhart Museum Curator James Lansing and Everhart Museum Board of Trustees Chair and attorney Caroline Munley, “Is staff at the Everhart Museum of Natural History, Science & Art in possession of Native American human remains? If so, when and how did the museum obtain those human remains? Has any museum representative tried to repatriate the human remains to the appropriate tribe? If not, why not?”
Museum representatives Holmes, Lansing and Munley failed to respond.
If Everhart Museum officials do possess Native American human remains, from where were these body parts looted? Does the museum know the name of the grave robber who handed over the human remains? Was money exchanged or services bartered? Do records of the macabre transaction exist? Did somebody lose, throw away or steal the Native American human remains?
Did museum officials contact any Native American tribes who might want to claim the human remains? Will museum officials search for the Native American human remains the NPS asserts the Everhart Museum reported? Will museum officials try to reintern the remains in a dignified manner?
Will federal law enforcement officials join this pursuit of justice?
Everhart Museum of Natural History, Science & Art officials serve the community as a non-profit organization always on the lookout for funding and tax deductible contributions. Everhart officials regularly welcome school children whose teachers depend on the museum to awaken their students’ curiosity and guide them morally and ethically. Museum officials also crave professional respect from colleagues.
Yet, based on their reluctance to tell the truth, their silence only provides heinous meaning to the word “whitewash” as they suffer a mortifying blow to their credibility.
Will we one day rectify these abuses to America’s sacred lessons of history?
Only time will tell.